Whose Water? A First Nation's Perspective

west_coast_trail.jpgAs is so often the case here in BC when controversy arises concerning land and resources, many non-natives rally to the cry that it is “our” resources or it's “public land” that's at stake.

 

To some First Nations, this, at best, is met with puzzlement; how did my People's traditional land and resources become something that belongs to all British Columbians?

 

A case in point is the recent issue of Nestle's water extraction operation in Hope. Here we have one of the largest corporations in the world taking 260 million litres of water per year from the Hope aquifer without charge. Certainly an issue to be concerned about; however, the media narrative is grounded in the notion of water as a public resource. The Sto:lo Nation communities of Chawathil and Union Bar would like to know how their rights and title to this particular resource was taken from them.

After all, Canada is supposedly a democratic society based on the rule of law and, after all, the highest law of the land, the Canadian constitution, “recognizes and affirms” Aboriginal Rights and Title; and finally, after all, there is a BC treaty process, as dysfunctional as it might be. These things are supposed to mean something, not just be token gestures to the reality of the usurpation of native sovereignty in this country.

And what has come with the usurpation of control over our traditional territories? Certainly not cleaner, healthier and more productive waterways. And certainly not inclusive, accountable and localized decision making that serves the common good.

A case in point is the antiquated BC Water Act, enacted over a century ago in 1909, when natives were considered “irrelevant” in public policy. When, in fact, it was illegal for us to hire legal representation or to organize politically to defend our rights. Usurpation is not gentle.

The Water Act, thus, most obviously lacks First Nations consultation and accommodation, to which is now legally obligated. The Act, further, and just as obviously, is not effective legislation for the industrial realities of our day; i.e., Nestle.

But, in moving forward on these matters, we must be mindful that this province has demonstrated that it is unable to manage abundance. Look at BC's history of forestry, fisheries and mineral extraction. And consider that there is a perception of abundance of fresh water in this province, (though there are some who beg to differ).

And when we consider the Nestle issue; we must be mindful that it's not just the Swiss based corporation that is extracting water but also Natural Glacier Waters (Neve, Canada Icefield), Polaris Water Company (Whistler Water), Aquaterra (Canadian Springs)... to name a few.

Perhaps most egregious is the use of water in existing and proposed LNG operations; which involves fracking, a practice that could annually take multi-millions of litres of water totally out of the water cycle, injecting it with toxins.

We have occasion to talk about these matters, and that occasion is now. The current BC government has promised to update the 1909 legislation, in what it's calling a “Water Sustainability Act”.

waterhandshake.jpg

So, all the way around, there are many good reasons to get moving on the reconciliation of rights and responsibilities between First Nations and Canada and BC. With fresh water, in particular, we can't afford to make a mistake. We must get to a better place than we have been with other natural resources in this province. We must get to a place where all of us who live here--who call this place home-- can truly say it is “our” water.

Do you like this post?

Showing 1 reaction


commented 2013-08-30 22:15:19 -0700 · Flag
Nestle is the same company went to indigenous African women with their baby formula, as there lactating breasts dried,and the babies rejected the formula, many, many died.